http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2009/11/10/cineplex-quarterly-earnings.html?ref=rss
The article Box office bonanza helps Cineplex buck recession discusses the increase in revenue for
Cineplex based on an increase in demand for movies in the third quarter.
The article states that the total revenue for Cineplex has increases by 7.7 percent from $239.1 million to
%257.5 million. The attendance went up by four percent since last year from 18 million to 18.8 million
viewers, this is an example of a change in demand. The price of movies has stayed the same but the
attendances has increased, thus shifting the demand curve to the right, seen on this graph. The demand
curve, D, shifts to the right to D1, the price, Pe1, has stayed the same but the quantity demanded, Qe,
has increased to Qe1.
According to the box office "the recession has been fantastic". In a recession consumers usually have
lower incomes, thus they can spend less money on goods and services. Restaurant meals are examples
of expensive goods, so the demand for restaurant meals, decreases during a recession, because it is a
normal good. Movie tickets, on the other hand, are cheap good, meaning their quantity demanded will
increase during a recession. This is an example of an inferior good. In this article movies are
represented as inferior goods. Movies are a cheaper substitutes for restaurant meals, furthermore, a
consumer can still have a night out, but only eating cheaper dinner at home than going to a movie
instead of going to a restaurant and a movie, spending over $100 a night.
Another interesting aspect is that the attendance of movies has gone up but the price has stayed
constant. To begin with, the movie theatre must have had empty seats, because the number of movie
theatres built has not increased because the situation is in the short run. The movie supply, S, is thus
inelastic because it takes a lot of time before a new movie theatre opens. The movie theatre is limited
to its capacity, which was not overflowing because the attendance has increased but not the price. In
this case the attendance, demand, has increased by four percent. This shifts the demand curve, D, out to
the right again to D1, because the price has stayed constant. The new quantity demanded has moved
from Qe to Qe1 increasing the price from Pe to Pe1 greatly. The supply is still inelastic because the firms
have not received enough time to react to the increase in demand thus; no new theatres have been
built yet. On the other hand, if the firm had been given enough time to react, long run, then the firm
would have built new theatres to support the increasing demand for movie tickets. The supply has
shifted from S to S1 in the long run, making it more elastic. The quantity demanded has reached Qe2
lower the price to Pe2.
Lastly, the price of concessions has gone up by 4.5 % while the attendance of movies has gone up by 4%
as well. These two goods are considered compliments for each other, because they go together. The
concessions sale especially booms when a family movie is shown, the entire family is present thus there
is an increase in demand for concessions. The firm has stated: "One thing we've been very conscious of
during the past year is we have not raised any of the prices on concessions". Again the price of
concessions has stayed the same but there has been an increase of 4.5 % demand for concessions. The
price has stayed constant at Pe but the quantity demanded, D, has shift the curve to the right, D1. This
moved the quantity demanded from Qe to Qe1.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen